Tiger Woods vs. Roger Federer discussion thread

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

s-aki, you forgot ketchup, mustard, and raddish on the weiner! And taht cheap-chinese-carryout fries does not taste good!

Anyway, congrats to federer for winning his 9th career GS. And tiger woods was there to congratulate! /versus/images/graemlins/smile.gif

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

frankly tiger woods looked pretty bored to me

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

yeah....i couldn't figure out why he was sort of bored. myabe its bc it was his first time seeing live tennis or that he knows federer was going to win regardless /versus/images/graemlins/smile.gif

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

It seemed more like tiger was doing a favor for nike, if you saw what he was wearing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jh...12/stfedr12.xml

head to head stats say
tigers closer to the lead
won more tournaments overall
and considering a golfers pro career life expectancy is much longer than a tennis player (MacEnroe and Agassi included) - tigers done in it in a relatively short period of time.

off the record
Tiger made people watch televised golf that didnt use to before. I doubt you can say the same about Federer in a comparatative sense.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

One must look at the weapons of choice to determine who the maximal extreme victor would be in such a collosal battle. Even with the very nice weight and projectility of a racket by a strong tennis arm I think woods would have the advantage in close range combat. For the soul steel golf swing would immoliate his opponent in a vicious barage of deadly swings. The ball runner would be dashing to pick up Federer's head as woods stood triumphant over his cold body.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

[ QUOTE ]
Vith_Dos said:

One must look at the weapons of choice to determine who the maximal extreme victor would be in such a collosal battle. Even with the very nice weight and projectility of a racket by a strong tennis arm I think woods would have the advantage in close range combat. For the soul steel golf swing would immoliate his opponent in a vicious barage of deadly swings. The ball runner would be dashing to pick up Federer's head as woods stood triumphant over his cold body.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahhh, but Federer would be more accustomed to running and thus should be able to escape Tiger easily.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

as fast as he can run, i dont think he can outrun a bling bling golfcart

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch



MEEP! MEEP!

*THUMP*

"I'M TIGER WOODS BYOTCH!"

*trail of blood*

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

[ QUOTE ]
PhoenixDth said:

It seemed more like tiger was doing a favor for nike, if you saw what he was wearing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jh...12/stfedr12.xml

head to head stats say
tigers closer to the lead
won more tournaments overall
and considering a golfers pro career life expectancy is much longer than a tennis player (MacEnroe and Agassi included) - tigers done in it in a relatively short period of time.

off the record
Tiger made people watch televised golf that didnt use to before. I doubt you can say the same about Federer in a comparatative sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

both woods and federer are sponsored by nike.

I can't and won't. i never say to compare career acomplishment...just dominance in their respective sport in the past three years.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

[ QUOTE ]
PhoenixDth said:

as fast as he can run, i dont think he can outrun a bling bling golfcart

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe roger will hire somebody to secretly pull a "monica seles" on woods. just kidding.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

[ QUOTE ]
Condor said:

[ QUOTE ]
PhoenixDth said:

It seemed more like tiger was doing a favor for nike, if you saw what he was wearing.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/main.jh...12/stfedr12.xml

head to head stats say
tigers closer to the lead
won more tournaments overall
and considering a golfers pro career life expectancy is much longer than a tennis player (MacEnroe and Agassi included) - tigers done in it in a relatively short period of time.

off the record
Tiger made people watch televised golf that didnt use to before. I doubt you can say the same about Federer in a comparatative sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

both woods and federer are sponsored by nike.

I can't and won't. i never say to compare career acomplishment...just dominance in their respective sport in the past three years.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why the last three years. Isn't Roger Federer 25 years old? Don't male tennis players start at 18 or 19 years old.

 

Re: Woods vs. Federer deathmatch

well....since 2004 onward, don't both tiger and roger won more majors and GS in that time span?